Schools run on a sequence so familiar we forget it was ever a choice: learn the thing, get tested on the thing, move up a year, repeat until you graduate and are finally allowed to go and do something real. Preparation first. Reality much later, if at all. I have come to think that sequence has it almost exactly backwards, and I have been quietly building our days around the reverse.
The pattern I keep coming back to isn't a business one, though it borrowed its shape from business. Notice something. Investigate it. Make something. Put that something in front of the world. Watch what happens, and improve. Then go round again. Dan Priestley describes a version of this for entrepreneurs – spot an opportunity, build, launch, learn, repeat, each cycle teaching more than the one before – and he's right that it works. I just don't think the loop belongs to entrepreneurs. It's how people learn almost anything. The business is only the version where you can see the loop most clearly, because at the end someone either bought the thing or they didn't.
Here is the part that took me a while to articulate. The learning isn't hiding in any single trip round the loop. It's in the repetition. A child who makes thirty real things between seven and eighteen – a bird guide for the neighbourhood, a wobbly first website, a board game whose rules don't quite work until the fourth draft, a newsletter nobody reads for six issues – has run thirty full cycles of noticing, building, meeting reality and adjusting. That child is not thirty facts better off. They are a different kind of person. The making is not the reward for the learning. The making is the learning, and doing it again is the curriculum.
I want to be careful here, because there is a fashionable version of this that I don't actually believe. The fashionable version says children should start businesses. Mine doesn't – and I say that as someone who buys and sells businesses for a living, so I'm hardly allergic to the idea. Turning it into "raise little entrepreneurs" shrinks a broad, human thing down into a career track, and most children are not going to run companies, nor should they have to. The output of a loop doesn't have to be money. It can be a piece of writing, a scientific question chased to the ground, a play performed for six bored relatives, a bit of open-source code, a broken thing repaired, a small event that got a few people into one room. What matters is not that the child sold something. What matters is that they made something that left their own head and met reality – because reality is the only teacher that never softens the mark.
This is also where the future quietly changes the maths. For most of history the cost of trying was high enough that preparation-first made sense: you couldn't let a ten-year-old publish software, design a real product, build a website, write and print a book, so you spent years getting them ready to maybe do those things one day. That constraint has mostly dissolved. A child today can build and ship a working thing in an afternoon, with a tutor that never tires and tools that used to need a whole team and a budget. When the cost of a single loop falls close to zero, the case for spending a childhood preparing to act – instead of acting, in small real ways, over and over – gets very thin. The rare thing in that world is not knowing a great deal before you begin. It's the willingness to begin badly and go round again.
I have realised, writing this, that it is the same question I keep circling in the other half of my work, only pointed at a younger person. There I ask how capable people turn ideas into things that create value. Here I am asking how a person becomes capable in the first place. Same loop, same faith that agency is built by making things that meet the world, not by being made ready in a room. One is about economic agency. This one is about the human kind that has to come first.
So we don't have a projects module or an enterprise unit – God help us. I just try to make sure that fairly often, something my children have actually thought about leaves the house: gets built, gets shown, gets used, gets judged by something other than me and their reliably impressed grandmother. Some of it fails. Good – a failed loop still went all the way round, which is more than a perfect worksheet ever manages. I am not trying to raise founders. I am trying to raise two people who reach for an idea and expect, in their bones, to be able to make it real.
← Back to Notes